Notepad Replacement Discussion

HomePage | RecentChanges | EditorIndex | TextEditorFamilies | Preferences

Showing revision 3

It seems as though Windows Notepad is one of the most hated programs in existence, judging by the number of TextEditors designed specifically to replace it.

What do you think?


I do not agree with the above statement. Notepad is intentionally made simple, which makes it useful in many occasions. In my opinion it can, in fact, get even simpler. The reason behind Notepad "replacement" is other than simply hating it. I use various text editors for various purposes and have created my own as well. I think the term "Notepad replacement" is rather to emphasize that the application is going to be similar to Notepad, because Notepad is already known to everyone.

Notepad is universal, but limited. Older versions (Win 3.X/95/98) had a 64K limit on the size of an edited file. Larger than that, and you were forced to Wordpad, which is a different animal. Notepad is also stupid. In particular, it doesn't grok Unix line endings. There are almost as many reasons to replace it with something as there are users of replacements. --DMcCunney

This is practically one of the TextEditorFamilies

In fact, I will add it.


And I populated it (--DMcCunney)
NotepadReplacement
HomePage | RecentChanges | EditorIndex | TextEditorFamilies | Preferences
Edit revision 3 of this page | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited January 12, 2011 5:14 am (diff)
Search: