EmacsLisp

HomePage | RecentChanges | EditorIndex | TextEditorFamilies | Preferences

Showing revision 2
Difference (from revision 2 to current revision) (minor diff)

Changed: 3,4c3,4
or maybe its the reverse?

Author: Richard M. Stallman
Homepage: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

Added: 6a7,11
Family: ScriptLanguage MacroLanguage
Platform: Windows, OS/X, Linux, others
License: GPL

or maybe its the reverse?

 EmacsFamily editors are probably the reason that Lisp has been such a popular MacroLanguage.

or maybe its the reverse?

 Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs_Lisp
 Manual:    http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/elisp.html

Lisp is well suited to being a MacroLanguage. It is a complete language which is relatively easy for people to integrate or write their own. It supports both procedural and functional styles as well as the ability to define new concepts (via LispMacros?).


HomePage | RecentChanges | EditorIndex | TextEditorFamilies | Preferences
Edit revision 2 of this page | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited April 28, 2009 3:42 pm (diff)
Search: